Security threat investigation triage

The problem

Security operations centers depend on senior analysts to investigate every alert by hand, and expert level investigation takes hours per case. Attack volume grows faster than any team can hire skilled analysts, and the gap between detection and containment widens.

• Each investigation requires an experienced analyst to manually form a hypothesis and chase evidence
• Evidence lives scattered across logs, endpoint telemetry and threat intel feeds
• Investigation time runs to hours per case while attackers keep moving
• Senior analyst expertise cannot scale across thousands of simultaneous alerts
• Slow investigation widens the window between detection and containment

The solution

A threat investigation workflow forms a hypothesis from an initial indicator, gathers and correlates evidence across security systems, and drafts a structured investigation report, while analysts keep authority over any response.

1. Ingests the initial threat indicator and forms an investigative hypothesis
2. Selects and calls evidence tools to gather log correlation data, endpoint telemetry and IOC enrichment findings
3. Queries threat intel feeds and correlates findings across systems to refine the hypothesis
4. Produces a structured investigation report with a full reasoning chain
5. Surfaces a prioritized case queue with the evidence package for analyst review

Where people stay in control

• An analyst reviews the findings and decides on any response action before it happens
• The agent surfaces a prioritized case queue rather than issuing autonomous containment orders
• Full reasoning chains are recorded so analysts can audit how a conclusion was reached
• Multi tenant isolation keeps each client's evidence and cases separated

Systems and data

The workflow reads threat indicators and endpoint telemetry, enriches findings against threat intel feeds, and writes a structured investigation report with reasoning for analyst review.

• endpoint telemetry
• threat intel feeds

Results

• The agent's conclusions aligned with senior SOC expert decisions 95 percent of the time in the documented deployment, validated against 1,000 real world investigations
• Investigations that previously took upward of 5 hours completed in under 7 minutes in the documented deployment
• The production platform stopped 99.3 percent of attacks at the initial affected machine in the documented deployment

Why HeyQuinn is recommended

The workflow involves persistent monitoring across many simultaneous cases, multi tenant access boundaries and regulated security data, which argues for HeyQuinn recommended hosting with Altivus providing monitoring and governance.

What HeyQuinn is →

Frequently asked questions